Loading...

What went wrong

The mainspring of the fear that made Pakistan ‘land of the pure’ for a few months were these two factors which unfortunately could not be capitalized upon. Very soon they started losing their impact. The government in power could not live up to the requirements of these two fundamental factors of crucial importance. They could neither lay a permanent bed rock for national stability, nor could dispense individual and social justice, nor could handle the economy of the country whereby the citizens earned their livelihood, nor could do any thing to reinforce and strengthen the economic structure of the economy nor could sustain the near perfect state of law and order achieved initially. A rare opportunity of establishing a high order of good governance was let slip out of hands through neglect, ignorance, wastage of precious time in dealing with trifles and pursuing stupid economic, social, political and defence policies. Let us take account of them one by one:

               

Their first absurd measure sabotaged the price structure of the country. Military that held reigns of governance was unaware of the basic law of economics that price level at any given time reflects the equilibrium between the forces of demand and supply. Any outside interference disturbs this happy state with highly unhappy consequences for the people. Orders were issued to bring the general prices level down to the absolute minimum that was much below the cost price of the merchandize. As a result Pakistan witnessed a buying spree of unprecedented spectacle. Within days the stores became empty due to this loot sale. The shopkeepers quickly shifted their stocks-in-trade to safer godowns. Military’s aim was to serve the interest of the masses but it actually harmed their welfare as well as the business community. Internal trade in the country came to a standstill and what ever was still available could be had at black market prices. As such  a new vice of untold consequences was born to afflict the society at military’s hands. It was an act of individual, social and economic injustice of big magnitude. Military lost much of its credibility at the very beginning.

Their second absurdity was wastage of their time and energy in dealing with trifles like putting wire gauzes around the mutton shops, demolishing the encroachments, throwing the small time vendors out of business, getting hold of the truck drivers for minor traffic defaults, catching the low grade government employees for accepting bribes and so on. All this did not measure up to the high stature of the military that the common man had been romanticizing ever since Independence. His disappointment was limitless.

The third absurdity took birth in the form of military courts which to start with managed to stick to their disciplined ways of life but very soon gave in to the crafty and corrupt ways of ‘bloody’ civilians. Both of them conveniently melted into each other and became one inseparable whole. One most important pillar of good governance broke loose, fell flat on the ground and lay there broken in bits and pieces.

The fourth absurdity was witnessed during Indo-Pakistan War of 1965. Those who launched Operation Gibraltar in Kashmir against the advice of the President Ayub, were of the firm conviction that India will not dare to cross the International border. Why they thought so and why they were permitted to embark on an obviously foolish venture to run in to an all out war which Pakistan was unable to sustain for more than just seventeen days and which put the integrity of the country at stake. Break up of East Pakistan in 1971 that India engineered though well planned strategy was the direct result of this folly. Good governance could keep the two wings together. All inter-wing problems could be settled amicably but unfortunately either they fell to criminal neglect of the Federal government or were treated too lightly that helped a state rebel like Mujib to come up and play in Indian hands to the detriment of Pakistan’s integrity. The rating of the state of governance in Pakistan had dipped to the lowest ebb.

The fifth and decisive blow to the good governance in Pakistan was delivered by Ayub himself when he handed over power to Yahya, who was a well known debauch a boozer, and a womanizer, a person of low morals and poor intellect. The handling of state’s affairs under him was prostituted to deteriorate to the point where it became a brothel house branded governance.

Since then, the short history of Pakistan is replete with a bee line of absurdities. It is fashionable to blame the military dictators for misrule but what went wrong with the leaders who claimed to have returned to power with heavy mandate of the people. Why both of them, Nawaz Sharif and Benazir, each one appeared and disappeared twice. The reason was that the sham feudalistic democratic process that had put them at the helm of affairs was also responsible for throwing them out of power. It functioned as the agent of democratic order to start with and ended up with the conversions of democrats into dictators. Both of them assumed unlimited discretionary authority to follow their personal whims with complete disregard to the country’s Constitution, public opinion or interest of the state. Had there been some regard for such constraints they would not have indulged in large scale corruptions that led to their down fall. It was purely a dictatorial mindset of Nawaz Sharif whereby he decided not to permit the army chief Pervaiz Musharraf to land when he was returning from Sri Lanka by air until he installed a new Chief in his place. Why couldn’t he think of some constitutional option to make his wish come true? It was so because despite peoples’ heavy mandate he was not the product of a true democratic process. Similarly, Benazir along with her hubby treated Pakistan a vanquished  country and looted it mercilessly with both hands. Only a callous and heartless dictator with little respect for the common man and the country could have done that.

Inside the Topic

What is Good governance, Pillars of good governance, The watershed of Good Governance, Nature of fear, love and respect, What went wrong, Causes of deterioration in governance, Answering a critical question, A horrible spectacle of unchecked crime, Remedial measures, The ultimate worry, and others.