Loading...

Lesson: Challenging Critical/Logical Reasoning - 21

Additional Question Types: Logical Flaws

[Page 20 of 24]

By now it should be apparent that many of the arguments you'll see on your test aren't well-supported. Most contain some type of logical flaw.

However, so far it's been your responsibility to figure out that a flaw exists and what to do about it. In the next question type that we'll review - the Logical Flaw question - you are told that a flaw exists. But now you must identify it directly.

We've already covered a number of the most common flaws in arguments:

  • In causal arguments, the author often fails to consider alternative causes.
  • In representativeness arguments, the sample may not be representative of the group.
  • In scope shifts, the author does not keep the scope of his argument consistent.

But there are two more of which you should be aware:

  • In necessary/sufficient errors, a requirement that is necessary for something to occur is confused with something that is sufficient for it to occur.
  • In correlation/causation errors, a correlation between two ideas is mistaken for causal relationship (or vice versa).

Let's take a look at an example of each.

Back Next

Next to display next topic in the chapter.

Video Lessons and 10 Fully Explained Grand Tests

Large number of solved practice MCQ with explanations. Video Lessons and 10 Fully explained Grand/Full Tests.

Current Menu
More for You